Is Systemic Chemotherapy Useful in Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases? A Propensity-Score Analysis.

PURPOSE: Multimodal treatment of colorectal (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM) includes systemic chemotherapy (SC) and surgical cytoreduction (CRS), eventually with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), in select patients. Considering lack of clear guidelines, this study was designed to analyze the role of chemotherapy and its timing in patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: Data from 13 Italian centers with PM expertise were collected by a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO). Clinicopathological variables, SC use, and timing of administration were correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local (peritoneal) DFS (LDFS) after propensity-score (PS) weighting to reduce confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients treated with CRS-HIPEC were included in the propensity-score weighting. Of the total patients, 19.9% did not receive chemotherapy within 6 months of surgery, 32.4% received chemotherapy before surgery (pregroup), 28.9% after (post), and 18.8% received both pre- and post-CRS-HIPEC treatment (peri). SC was preferentially administered to younger (p = 0.02) and node-positive (p = 0.010) patients. Preoperative SC is associated with increased rate of major complications (26.9 vs. 11.3%, p = 0.0009). After PS weighting, there were no differences in OS, DFS, or LDFS (p = 0.56, 0.50, and 0.17) between chemotherapy-treated and untreated patients. Considering SC timing, the post CRS-HIPEC group had a longer DFS and LDFS than the pre-group (median DFS 15.4 vs. 9.8 m, p = 0.003; median LDFS 26.3 vs. 15.8 m, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CRC-PM treated with CRS-HIPEC, systemic chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival benefit. The adjuvant schedule was related to prolonged disease-free intervals. Additional, randomized studies are required to clarify the role and timing of systemic chemotherapy in this patient subset.

Impact of Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy on Survival for Patients Who have Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Treated with CRS-HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: The available data on the role of perioperative systemic chemotherapy (SC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) patients undergoing (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is heterogeneous and unstandardized. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SC on the survival outcomes of DMPM patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC and to identify prognostic factors that affect the decision to administer SC. METHODS: Patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC in the National Cancer Institute Milan (1995-2020) were retrospectively analyzed using propensity score-matching of known covariates. The patients were grouped into three groups: group A (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NACT] and no-SC), group B (no-SC and adjuvant chemotherapy [ACT]), and group C (NACT and ACT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meir method, and prognostic factors were calculated using the Cox-regression method. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 45 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.348-83.652 months) for group A, 115 months (95% CI, 44.379-185.621 months) for group B, and 88 months (95% CI, 3.296-172.704 months) for group C, the study analyzed 154 DMPM patients consisting of matched group A (NACT: 60 + no-SC: 52 = 112), group B (ACT: 38 + no-SC: 38 = 76), and group C (NACT: 31 + ACT: 31 = 62). The patients undergoing ACT had better 5-year OS and PFS than the patients undergoing NACT. In the multivariate analysis, ACT was significantly associated with improved OS by 48% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.280-0.965, p = 0.038). For PFS, the association of ACT did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.531; 95% CI, 0.266-1.058; p = 0.072). CONCLUSION: The optimum treatment sequence for DMPM is CRS-HIPEC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients. Upfront surgery appears preferable to NACT for patients amenable to complete CRS.

Mytomicin-C, Metronomic Capecitabine, and Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable or Relapsed Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Appendiceal Origin.

INTRODUCTION: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare, slow growing tumor, traditionally considered chemoresistant. The only curative approach is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). At disease relapse, or in patients with inoperable disease at diagnosis, no standard treatment has been defined, though nonrandomized series showed promising results with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in patients with relapsed or unresectable PMP and confirmed disease progression at baseline. Patients received MMC (7 mg/m2 every 6 weeks, up to a maximum of 4 cycles) plus metronomic capecitabine (625 mg/sqm/day b.i.d.) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate according to RECIST v1.1 criteria, serum markers response and safety. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included. At a median follow-up of 26.1 months (IQR, 17.7-49.6), median PFS was 17.9 months (95% CI, 11.0-NE), with 1-year PFS and OS rates of 73% and 87%. Safety profile was manageable, with only 13% G3/G4 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Metronomic capecitabine, bevacizumab, and MMC are an active regimen in advanced and progressive PMP and favorably compares with historical series.

Risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation and anastomotic leak in patients submitted to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal leak is one of the most feared complications after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) and harbors significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. We aim to identify risk-factors for anastomotic leak (AL) and gastrointestinal perforation (GP) to optimize postoperative outcomes of this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1043 consecutive patients submitted to CRS in a single institution. Potential risk factors for AL and GP, both related to patient overall condition, disease status and surgical technique were reviewed. RESULTS: Anastomotic leaks were identified in 5.2% of patients, and GPs in 7.0%. The independent risk-factors for AL were age at surgery (OR1.40; CI95% 1.10-1.79); peritoneal cancer index (PCI) (OR1.04, CI95% 1.01-1.07); Cisplatin dose >240 mg during HIPEC (OR3.53; CI95% 1.47-8.56) and the presence of colorectal (CR) or colo-colic (CC) anastomosis (OR5.09; CI95% 2.71-9.53, and 4.58; CI95% 1.22-17.24 respectively). Male gender and intraoperative red blood cell transfusions were the only independent risk factors for GP identified (OR1.70; CI95% 1.04-2.78 and 1.06; CI95% 1.01-1.12, respectively). Regarding 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality, independent risk-factors were mainly related to patient's overall condition. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal leaks are a frequent source of postoperative morbidity, mainly at the expense of GP. A careful and systematic intraoperative revision of all potential gastrointestinal injuries is equally critical to perfecting anastomotic fashioning techniques to decrease gastrointestinal complication rates. We identified multiple risk-factors for AL and GP related to disease status and patient condition. Our study suggests that patient-related conditions are of paramount relevance, highlighting the importance of patient selection and preoperative patient optimization.

2022 PSOGI Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare and aggressive primary peritoneal disease, with recommended treatment, in eligible patients, of a combination of complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As treatment is multimodal, there is a wide heterogeneity of HIPEC protocols precluding clear comparisons. Standardization at an international level is required. METHODS: The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) designated a steering committee to produce consensus recommendations for HIPEC regimens, adapted to each etiology. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used, based on a systematic review focused on main outcomes related to HIPEC regimens in DMPM patients and on the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) method to elaborate main questions. An opinion survey was added. Furthermore, a Delphi process was performed with voting from a panel of international experts. RESULTS: Eleven questions were elaborated, including two for future research requirements and three to assess the HIPEC regimen preference of the panel. The level of evidence underlying questions was globally low. Overall, 75 (86%) and 67 (77%) of the 87 invited experts completed the vote at the first and second round, respectively. HIPEC following complete CRS was strongly supported by 88% of voters with no need to plan comparative studies with CRS alone for 61.2% of voters. Bi-drug regimens appeared to be preferred to mono-drug ones and cisplatin was globally favored. The opinion survey confirmed the combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin as the recommended regimen. CONCLUSION: International consensus confirmed the indication of HIPEC following complete CRS in DMPM patients and recommended cisplatin-doxorubicin as the first-line HIPEC regimen.

Systemic metastases from low-grade and high-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei: Treatments and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The metastasizing potential of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is largely unknown. We assessed incidence, impact on prognosis, treatments, and outcomes of systemic metastases after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). METHODS: A prospective database of 327 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PMP of appendiceal origin was reviewed. PMP was graded according to the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) classification. Haematogenous metastases, and non-regional lymph-node involvement were considered as systemic metastases. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 74.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68.0-94.8), systemic metastases occurred in 21 patients. Eleven patients were affected by low-grade PMP, and ten by high-grade PMP. Metastatic disease involved the lung (n = 12), bone (n = 1), liver (n = 4), distant nodes (n = 3), both lung and distant nodes (n = 1). Systemic metastases independently correlated with PSOGI histological subtypes (P = 0.001), and incomplete cytoreduction (P = 0.026). Median OS was 139.0 months (95%CI = 56.6-161.9) for patients who experienced systemic metastases, and 213.8 months (95%CI = 148.7-not reached) for those who did not (P = 0.159). Eight of eleven patients who had curative-intent surgery are presently alive at a median of 52.5 months (range 2.0-112.7). Seven are disease-free at a median of 27.4 months (range 2.0-110.4). At multivariate analysis, PSOGI histological subtypes (P = 0.001), completeness of cytoreduction (P = 0.001), and preoperative systemic chemotherapy (P = 0.020) correlated with poorer survival. Systemic metastases did not (P = 0.861). CONCLUSIONS: After CRS/HIPEC, systemic metastases occur in a small but clinically relevant number of patients, and the risk increases with incomplete cytoreduction and aggressive histology. In selected patients, surgical resection of metastatic disease can result in long survival.

Microsatellite and RAS/RAF Mutational Status as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to prolonged survival for selected patients with colorectal (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aimed to analyze the prognostic role of micro-satellite (MS) status and RAS/RAF mutations for patients treated with CRS. METHODS: Data were collected from 13 Italian centers with PM expertise within a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Clinical and pathologic variables and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational and MS status were correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The study enrolled 437 patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. The median OS was 42.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.4-51.2 months], and the median DFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 12.3-14.9 months). The local (peritoneal) DFS was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.4-24.6 months). In addition to the known clinical factors, KRAS mutations (p = 0.005), BRAF mutations (p = 0.01), and MS status (p = 0.04) were related to survival. The KRAS- and BRAF-mutated patients had a shorter survival than the wild-type (WT) patients (5-year OS, 29.4% and 26.8% vs 51.5%, respectively). The patients with micro-satellite instability (MSI) had a longer survival than the patients with micro-satellite stability (MSS) (5-year OS, 58.3% vs 36.7%). The MSI/WT patients had the best prognosis. The MSS/WT and MSI/mutated patients had similar survivals, whereas the MSS/mutated patients showed the worst prognosis (5-year OS, 70.6%, 48.1%, 23.4%; p = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, OS was related to the Peritoneal Cancer Index [hazard ratio (HR), 1.05 per point], completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (HR, 2.8), N status (HR, 1.6), signet-ring (HR, 2.4), MSI/WT (HR, 0.5), and MSS/WT-MSI/mutation (HR, 0.4). Similar results were obtained for DFS. CONCLUSION: For patients affected by CRC-PM who are eligible for CRS, clinical and pathologic criteria need to be integrated with molecular features (KRAS/BRAF mutation). Micro-satellite status should be strongly considered because MSI confers a survival advantage over MSS, even for mutated patients.

HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed with a wide variation in methodology, drugs, and other elements vital to the procedure. Adoption of a limited number of regimens could increase the collective experience of peritoneal oncologists, make comparison between studies more meaningful, and lead to a greater acceptance of results from randomized trials. This study aimed to determine the possibility of standardizing HIPEC methodology and regimens and to identify the best method of performing such a standardization. METHODS: A critical review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects of different HIPEC drugs and drug regimens, the impact of hyperthermia, and the efficacy of various HIPEC regimens as well as studies comparing different regimens was performed. RESULTS: The preclinical and clinical data were limited, and studies comparing different regimens were scarce. Many of the regimens were neither supported by preclinical rationale or data nor validated by a dose-escalating formal phase 1 trial. All the regimens were based on pharmacokinetic data and did not take chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases into account. Personalized medicine approaches such as patient-derived tumor organoids could offer a solution to this problem, although clinical validation is likely to be challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from randomized trials, more translational research and phases 1 and 2 studies are needed. While waiting for better preclinical and clinical evidence, the best way to minimize heterogeneity is by an expert consensus that aims to identify and define a limited number of regimens for each indication and primary site. The choice of regimen then can be tailored to the patient profile and its expected toxicity and the methodology according regional factors.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases: Multicenter Study of 'Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam-S.I.C.O.'

BACKGROUND: The development of multimodality treatment, including cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has led to promising results in selected patients with peritoneal disease of gastric origin. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of synchronous peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. METHODS: The Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam-S.I.C.O. retrospective registry included patients with synchronous peritoneal malignancy from gastric cancer submitted to gastrectomy with CRS and HIPEC between 2005 and 2018 from 11 high-volume, specialized centers. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients with a median age of 58 years (range 26-75) were enrolled. The median overall survival (OS) time for the whole group of patients was 20.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.8-28.5] and the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 7.3 months (95% CI 4-10.6). The completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS) of 0 and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score of ≤ 6 groups showed a significantly better long-term survival (median OS 40.7 and 44.3 months, respectively) compared with the incomplete resected groups (median OS 10.7 months, p = 0.003) and PCI score of > 6 group (median OS 13.4 months, p = 0.005). A significant difference was observed in the survival rate according to neoadjuvant treatment (untreated patients: 10.7 months, 95% CI 5.1-16.2; treated patients: 35.3 months, 95% CI 2.8-67.8; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: In referral centers, CRS and HIPEC after neoadjuvant treatment significantly improved survival in selected patients. Patients with a PCI score ≤ 6, complete cytoreduction, negative nodal involvements, and negative cytology had encouraging results, showing a clinically meaningful survival.

Impact of Previous Gynecologic Surgical Procedures on Outcomes of Non-Gynecologic Peritoneal Malignancies Mimicking Ovarian Cancer: Less Is More?

BACKGROUND: Non-gynecologic rare peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) often are misdiagnosed as disseminated ovarian cancer and initially treated by gynecologic surgeons. This study aimed to assess whether these previous maneuvers (i.e., full surgical staging and/or cytoreductive attempts) affect outcomes after the definitive surgery performed in a tertiary center. METHODS: The study reviewed 298 women affected by non-gynecologic PSM who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after previous gynecologic surgery. Prior surgery was categorized as limited surgery (pLS: abdominal exploration with biopsy plus adnexectomy and/or appendectomy) or extended surgery (pES: full surgical staging or cytoreductive attempts including hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). RESULTS: Of the 298 patients, 143 had pLS and 153 had pES. Morbidity was similar between the groups (P = 0.143), but the pES group had more severe urinary tract injuries (19 vs. 3; P < 0.001), longer operating time (585.9 vs. 506.7; P = 0.027), and more patients needing more than two anastomoses (41 vs. 26; P = 0.033). Age older than 55 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.42; P = 0.009) and number of anastomoses (OR 3.17; P = 0.002) correlated with severe morbidity; pES correlated with urinary tract grades 3 and 4 injuries (OR 7.9; P = 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse was significantly higher in the pES group (0.41 vs. 0.27; P = 0.012; median follow-up period, 69 months). The multivariate analysis identified a Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) higher than 20 and pES as independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: For women undergoing CRS±HIPEC for non-gynecologic PSM, the risk for locoregional relapse and severe postsurgical urinary tract complications is increased by pES. Therefore, prior full surgical staging or cytoreductive attempts without definitive gynecologic histology should be avoided. Prophylactic ureteral stenting and stricter oncologic follow-up assessment must be considered in this scenario.

Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated by Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Mitomycin C-Based HIPEC: A Comparative Study Using the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS).

BACKGROUND: The Prodige-7 trial has questioned the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC-PM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared a prospectively collected group of 48 patients undergoing oxaliplatin/irinotecan-based perioperative systemic chemotherapy (s-CT) with targeted agents, and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) (no-HIPEC group) with 48 controls undergoing the same perioperative s-CT and CRS/HIPEC (HIPEC group). Patients were matched (1:1) according to the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score, completeness of cytoreduction, history of extraperitoneal disease (EPD), and Peritoneal Cancer Index. RESULTS: The groups were comparable, except for a higher number of patients in the HIPEC group with World Health Organization performance status 0, pN2 stage primary tumor, and treated with preoperative s-CT. Forty-one patients in the no-HIPEC group and 43 patients in the HIPEC group had optimal comprehensive treatment (P = 0.759), defined as complete cytoreduction of PM and margin-negative EPD resection. Median follow-up was 31.6 months in the no-HIPEC group and 39.9 months in the HIPEC group. Median overall survival was 39.3 months in the no-HIPEC group and 34.8 months in the HIPEC group (P = 0.702). In the two groups, severe morbidity occurred in 14 (29.2%) and 13 (27.1%) patients, respectively (P = 1.000), with no operative deaths. On multivariate analysis, left-sided primary and curative treatment independently correlated with better survival while HIPEC did not (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.15; P = 0.178). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed that, in selected patients, perioperative s-CT and surgical treatment of CRC-PM resulted in unexpectedly high survival rates. Mitomycin C-based HIPEC did not increase morbidity but did not impact prognosis.

Clinico-pathological outcomes after total parietal peritonectomy, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced serous papillary peritoneal carcinoma submitted to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy- largest single institute experience.

INTRODUCTION: Serous papillary peritoneal carcinoma (SPPC) is a rare clinical entity. Based on the understanding of the pattern of spread, its multifocality, polyclonality and the high frequency of diffuse, widespread peritoneal metastasis, a robust rationale for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for SPPC exists. Herein we report the clinical outcomes of SPPC patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NACT) followed by CRS including total parietal peritonectomy and HIPEC. METHODS: Clinico-pathological data of 22 patients of serous papillary peritoneal carcinoma (SPPC) was retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database from June 2000 to July 2017. Patients were treated with CRS, total parietal peritonectomy and HIPEC with cisplatin (42 mg/L of perfusate) and doxorubicin (15 mg/L of perfusate) after NACT. Survival curves were calculated from the date of surgery. RESULTS: 22 patients underwent CRS, total parietal peritonectomy and HIPEC. The median age was 62 years (Range 47-72). On histological evaluation, 18/30 (60%) parietal peritonectomy specimens showed microscopic disease, when no disease was evident macroscopically at surgical exploration. Grade III-IV surgical complications were recorded in 4/22 (18%) patients. There was no postoperative mortality. At a median follow up of 12 months, the five-year overall survival (OS) was 64.9%. The median OS was not reached. Median progression-free survival was 32.9 months and progression-free survival at 5 years was 33.2%. CONCLUSION: CRS with total peritonectomy + HIPEC after NACT, presents as a promising treatment modality for SPPC, and could be associated with good survival results in patients with SPPC.

Well differentiated papillary peritoneal mesothelioma treated by cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-the experience of the PSOGI registry.

BACKGROUND: Well differentiated papillary peritoneal mesothelioma (WDPPM) is a rare variant of mesothelioma which affects mainly women in the reproductive age. The disease may present multifocally and recur after primary resection. Our aim was to describe the outcomes of cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this disease. METHODS: Patients with histological diagnosis of WDPPM were retrieved from the PSOGI registry. Demographical and clinical data were extracted as well as outcomes data (overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS)). RESULTS: We analyzed 45 patients for whom complete data was available. The majority of patients were women (n = 33, 73%) with a median age of 44 years. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) was administered in 8 patients (18%). Median peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 9 (1-30), and complete cytoreduction was achieved in 69% of patients. There was one case (2%) of postoperative mortality, and 24% rate of severe morbidity. Overall, there were 4 deaths and 5 years OS was 80%. 8 patients (18%) had disease recurrence, all within 5 years from operation. On univariate analysis preoperative CT, high PCI and severe morbidity were associated with reduced RFS. On multivariate analysis, only preoperative CT (HR = 32.6, 95% CI: 2.39-446.2, p = 0.009) and high PCI (HR = 21.7, 95% CI: 1.11-425.7, p = 0.04) remained significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: WDPPM can be a lethal disease with substantial recurrence even after aggressive treatment. Patients presenting with extensive disease or disease recurrence after surgical excision are at increased risk for relapse. CRS + HIPEC can be safely applied to WDPPM in specialized centers.

Iterative cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A multi-institutional experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this multi-institutional study were to assess the feasibility of iterative cytoreductive surgery (iCRS)/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, iCRS in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC), evaluate survival, recurrence, morbidity and mortality outcomes, and identify prognostic factors for overall survival. METHODS: Patients with CRPC that underwent an iCRS, with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy, from June 1993 to July 2016 at 13 institutions were retrospectively analyzed from prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS: The study comprised of 231 patients, including 126 females (54.5%) with a mean age at iCRS of 51.3 years. The iterative high-grade (3/4) morbidity and mortality rates were 23.4% and 1.7%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival was 15.0 and 10.1 months after initial and iCRS, respectively. The median and 5-year survivals were 49.1 months and 43% and 26.4 months and 26% from the initial and iCRS, respectively. Independent negative predictors of survival from the initial CRS included peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) > 20 ( P = 0.02) and lymph node positivity ( P = 0.04), and from iCRS, PCI > 10 ( P = 0.03 for PCI 11-20; P < 0.001 for PCI > 20), high-grade complications ( P = 0.012), and incomplete cytoreduction ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: iCRS can provide long-term survival benefits to highly selected colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis patients with comparable mortality and morbidity rates to the initial CRS procedure. Careful patient selection is necessary to improve overall outcomes.

Should a History of Extraperitoneal Disease Be a Contraindication to Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases?

BACKGROUND: Survival improvements have been reported in selected patients affected by colorectal peritoneal metastases who were undergoing cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Treatment of peritoneal metastases associated with extraperitoneal disease is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the prognostic impact of a history of extraperitoneal disease that was curatively treated either at the same time as or before the onset of peritoneal metastases. DESIGN: We reviewed 2 prospective databases. Peritoneal involvement was scored by Peritoneal Cancer Index. SETTINGS: Our study was conducted in 2 high-volume peritoneal malignancy management institutions. PATIENTS: A total of 148 patients with peritoneal metastases were included. In 27 patients, extraperitoneal disease involving the liver (n = 23), lung (n = 1), both lung and liver (n = 2), or inguinal lymph nodes and liver (n = 1) was curatively treated either simultaneously with peritoneal metastases (n = 22) or before their onset (n = 5). INTERVENTIONS: All of the macroscopic tumors were removed by means of peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections. Microscopic residual disease was treated by mitomycin C/cisplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 34.6 months (95% CI, 22.6-65.7 mo), 5-year survival of patients treated for both peritoneal and extraperitoneal disease versus peritoneal metastases alone was 16.5% versus 52.0% (p = 0.019). After multivariate analysis, reduced survival correlated with extraperitoneal disease (p = 0.001), Peritoneal Cancer Index >19 (p = 0.004), and peritoneal residual disease >2.5 mm (p = 0.018). Three prognostic groups were defined, and median survival was not reached for group 1 (Peritoneal Cancer Index ≤19 and no extraperitoneal disease), reached in 27.0 months for group 2 (Peritoneal Cancer Index ≤9 and extraperitoneal disease), and reached in 11.6 months for group 3 (Peritoneal Cancer Index >19 and no extraperitoneal disease or Peritoneal Cancer Index >9 and extraperitoneal disease). LIMITATIONS: The main study limitation is its observational nature. CONCLUSIONS: A history of extraperitoneal disease is associated with poorer prognosis. However, survival benefit may be obtained in selected patients with limited peritoneal involvement. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A655.

Dose-Dependent Effect of Red Blood Cells Transfusion on Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes in Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Treated with Cytoreduction and HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are associated with increased red blood cell transfusion (RBT) demand. Although the deleterious effects of RBT are documented in various settings, its effect in this setting is obscure. In this study, we evaluated the effects of different-grade RBT on the short- and long-term outcomes of CRS and HIPEC. METHODS: We analyzed 231 patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) and 273 patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) operated in our unit. RBT was categorized according to the amount of packed red blood cell units (PRBCs) administered (0, 1-2, 3-5, > 6). The effects of RBT on long-term oncological outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] were assessed by using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 74% of the patients were transfused with a median of 2 PRBCs (range 0-37). Transfusion level correlated with operative time, surgical extent (as measured by the peritoneal carcinomatosis index), and age. Postoperatively, patients with major transfusion (> 6 PRBCs) had increased mortality rate (11.1%, p = 0.01) and length of hospital stay (31.2 ± 16.8 days, p = 0.01) compared with other levels of RBT. RBT was dose-dependently associated with oncological outcomes in both DMPM and PMP for both PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.74, p = 0.003; HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.81, p = 0.001, respectively] and OS (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.21-2.03, p = 0.001; HR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.90, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a dose-dependent relationship between RBT and oncological outcomes. Further research to develop transfusion sparing protocols is needed in this extensive surgical procedure.